The Clinical Efficacy of Manual Irrigation for the Prevention of Postoperative Bleeding of Transurethral Prostate Resection / La eficacia clínica de la irrigación manual para la prevención del sangrado posoperatorio de la resección transuretral de próstata

Introduction: Postoperative blood loss after prostate surgery is thought to be associated with an increase in urinary fibrinolytic activity. We investigated the effects of the local dilution of fibrinolytic agents with manual irrigation on postoperative bleeding after the transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). Materials and methods: Between April 2017 and April 2021, 128 patients were prospectively randomised into two equal groups. Monopolar TUR-P was applied to all patients for benign prostatic hyperplasia, but post procedure manual irrigation was used in group 2 only. Haemoglobin levels were evaluated before and after TUR-P. Intra-op and post operative bleeding, amount of saline used for irrigation, duration of catheterisation and length of hospital stay were noted. The patients were followed up 1 month after the TUR-P. Results: The resected adenoma weight was 12.64 g in group 1 and 13.11 g in group 2. There was no difference between groups 1 and 2 in terms of haemoglobin loss and total blood loss within the first 24 h after TUR-P, which were 0.82 g and 0.95 g (P = 0.443) and 90.45 mL and 67.80 mL (P = 0.102), respectively. There was also no significant difference between the groups in the saline volume used for irrigation (19 vs. 17.3 L), catheter duration and hospital stay (2.6 vs. 2.6 days). Conclusions: We could not show the positive effects of manual irrigation on bleeding complications after TUR-P, though it is a simple and safe-seeming procedure with no specific operative technique. (AU)

Introducción: Se cree que la pérdida de sangre postoperatoria después de la cirugía de próstata está asociada con un aumento en la actividad fibrinolítica urinaria. Investigamos los efectos de la dilución local de fibrinolíticos con irrigación manual sobre el sangrado postoperatorio tras la resección transuretral de próstata (RTU-P). Materiales y métodos: entre abril de 2017 y abril de 2021, 128 pacientes fueron aleatorizados prospectivamente en dos grupos iguales. Se aplicó RTU-P monopolar a todos los pacientes por hiperplasia prostática benigna, pero solo en el grupo 2 se usó irrigación manual posterior al procedimiento. Los niveles de hemoglobina se evaluaron antes y después de la RTU-P. Se registraron el sangrado intraoperatorio y posoperatorio, la cantidad de solución salina utilizada para la irrigación, la duración del cateterismo y la duración de la estancia hospitalaria. Los pacientes fueron seguidos 1 mes después de la RTU-P. Resultados: El peso del adenoma resecado fue de 12,64 g en el grupo 1 y de 13,11 g en el grupo 2. No hubo diferencia entre los grupos 1 y 2 en cuanto a la pérdida de hemoglobina y la pérdida total de sangre dentro de las primeras 24 h después de la RTU-P, que fueron de 0,82. g y 0,95 g (P = 0,443) y 90,45 mL y 67,80 mL (P = 0,102), respectivamente. Tampoco hubo diferencias significativas entre los grupos en el volumen de solución salina utilizada para la irrigación (19 frente a 17,3 l), la duración del catéter y la estancia hospitalaria (2,6 frente a 2,6 días). Conclusiones: No pudimos mostrar los efectos positivos de la irrigación manual sobre las complicaciones hemorrágicas después de la RTU-P, aunque es un procedimiento simple y aparentemente seguro sin una técnica quirúrgica específica. (AU)

Conversion of Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate to Open Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and predictive factors for conversion to an open procedure during Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate (HoLEP). METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on files of all patients that underwent HoLEP at our institution between 2013 and 2020. Data collected included demographics, pre-operative estimated prostate size, intraoperative data, pathologic data, and functional baseline. A univariate and multivariate comparison between the pre-operative data of converted and un-converted cases was conducted. RESULTS: Among a total of 807 HoLEP procedure performed during the above period, 20 cases were converted to open procedures (2.4%). Median pre-operative estimated prostate size in cases of conversion was 228ml compared to 95ml for unconverted cases (P <.001). The reasons for conversion were anatomical in 8 cases (40%), bleeding that was difficult to control endoscopically in 4 cases (20%), expected procedure to be too long due to large prostate size in 6 cases (30%), one case of morcellation technical malfunction, and one case with very large bladder stones not suitable for endoscopic treatment. Prostate size was the only factor that was found to be associated with conversion in univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: The risk of conversion of HoLEP to open procedures is size-dependent. The risk for conversion to open prostatectomy/cystotomy must be communicated to patients who choose HoLEP to improve the informed consent process and provide the highest quality of patient care and transparency. Open prostatectomy/cystotomy should be a part of the armamentarium of every HoLEP surgeon operating on large prostates.

Track and Teach: Identifying Key Movement Patterns in Endoscopic Transurethral Enucleation of the Prostate.

PURPOSE: We evaluated a system for noninvasive quantitative motion tracking to recognize differences in the movement pattern of experienced surgeons and beginners. Since performing endoscopic procedures requires extensive training, and tissue damage due to disruptive movements with sudden acceleration is possible, the learning curve for beginners is of clinical relevance. Steepening this curve may improve patient outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used a commercial gyroscope sensor with a wireless data link, which was attached to the resectoscope handle (RH). After recording, orientation was retrieved by application of the calculated rotation matrices to the RH vector relative to the sensor under the boundary condition of rotational movement around and quasi-constant distance to the pivot point at pelvic floor level. Data alignment, normalization, interpolation, and analysis were performed in custom software scripts. RESULTS: Experienced surgeons and beginners were recorded in n = 36 and n = 14 holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), respectively. Prostate size, patient age, and recorded procedure duration were comparable. Mean lever angle of the individual normalized motion patterns was considerably lower (19.28 ± 0.54° [SEM]) in the advanced than in the beginners' group (24.52 ± 1.00°; p = 0.0001). Further parameters such as velocity and motion variation demonstrated additional differences between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate the feasibility of motion tracking in HoLEP. Pronounced differences exist between different stages of surgeon experience with this procedure. The method can easily be adopted to aide young surgeons in resectoscope handling and identification of improvable motion patterns. Damage to the pelvic floor and surrounding tissue may thus be reduced.

Enucleación prostática con láser de holmio. A lo que todos deberíamos aspirar / Holmium laser prostate enucleation. All we should aim for

OBJETIVO: La enucleación prostática se ha abierto camino dentro de la cirugía de la hiperplasia benigna de próstata (HBP) hasta convertirse en su técnica de referencia. Numerosos estudios avalan especialmente al láser de holmio (HoLEP) como la fuente de energía más representativa, segura y eficaz. Sin embargo, su larga curva de aprendizaje sigue dificultando su implantación. El propósito de esta revisión es describir paso a paso la técnica quirúrgica que empleamos en nuestro centro para ayudar a la extensión de la HoLEP, así como demostrar por qué creemos que esta variante es la más eficaz y eficiente de todas las variantes disponibles. MÉTODOS: Hemos realizado una detallada descripción paso a paso de nuestra técnica de enucleación prostática con láser de holmio, centrándonos en las principales diferencias que presenta con las variantes más extendidas y haciendo incapié en sus fortalezas frente a las series con más experiencia. RESULTADOS: Ninguna de las series publicadas hasta la fecha ha demostrado mejores resultados funcionales, mayor seguridad o menores complicaciones a corto o largo plazo que los datos de nuestra serie. No hay diferencias en cuanto a sangrado intra o post-operatorio, reintervenciones, perforaciones de cápsula o estenosis de uretra. Nuestra serie tiene mejores tiempos quirúrgicos que cualquier otra, demostrando una mayor eficiencia que técnicas en bloque o trilobulares. Todo ello logrando unas tasas de continencia temprana o inmediata iguales o mejores (4% vs 5-40%). Por último, el uso de dispositivos de morcelación mejorados hace que carezcamos de complicaciones durante esta fase del procedimiento. CONCLUSIONES: La HoLEP es la técnica de referencia a la que debería aspirar cualquier servicio de urología moderno, aunando los mejores datos funcionales y de seguridad que se pueden obtener actualmente en el tratamiento de la HBP. Para ello es necesario disponer de una técnica estandarizada y optimizada que permita su máxima difusión

OBJECTIVE: Prostate enucleation is becoming more relevant within BPH treatment. Nowadays is probably the gold standard for enucleation. Several studies have shown holmium laser as the most frequently used safe and efficient energy source. The long learning curve remains as its major drawback. The current review aims to describe step to step technique at our institution and describing the rational for its use. METHODS: A detailed description on our step-to-step Holep technique is provided. We focused on the main differences with other techniques already described highlighting the largest experience reported. RESULTS: None of the published series has shown better results in terms of functional, safety and less complications outcomes on the short and long term. No differences are shown in terms of intraoperative/postoperative blood loss, reoperations, capsular perforations or urethral strictures. Our techniques provides shorter surgical length and improved efficiency than blocking and trilobular techniques. The rates of early continence are 4% vs 5-40%. Lastly, improvement in morcellator devices delivered no complications related to that part of the surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Holep is the gold standard technique for prostate enucleation. It provides improved functional and safety outcomes than with other techniques. A standardized and optimized technique is mandatory

Re: Intra-operative Oxycodone Reduced Postoperative Catheter-Related Bladder Discomfort Undergoing Transurethral Resection Prostate. A Prospective, Double Blind Randomized Study.

none.

Is transurethral needle ablation of prostate out of fashion? Outcomes of single session office-based transurethral needle ablation of prostate in patients with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Purpose: Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), office-based TUNA is an attractive alternative as it is minimally invasive and avoids general anaesthesia. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of single session office-based TUNA. Materials and Methods: Data of 121 patients who had undergone TUNA was retrieved from June 2008 to March 2017. Patients were followed-up with visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12-months with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) scoring and uroflowmetry. Results: Patients were 39 to 85 years old. The prostate volumes were 20.00 to 96.90 mL with a median of 26.95 mL. The median IPSS score pre-TUNA was 19, median QOL score pre-TUNA was 4 and median maximum urinary flow (Qmax) pre-TUNA was 10.3 mL/s. There is 65% improvement of IPSS post-TUNA (p<0.001). There is 75% improvement of QOL post-TUNA QOL (p<0.001). There is 35% improvement of Qmax post-TUNA Qmax (p<0.001). The mean relapse-free survival for TUNA is 6.123 years. The 1st, 3rd, and 5th year relapse-free survival rate were 91.7%, 76.6% and 63.7% respectively. Conclusions: Our study is the first to investigate the use of a single-setting office-based TUNA requiring minimal sedation in the Asian community. Complication rates were low in our series, with no associated mortality. When applied to selected patients, TUNA is an effective and reasonably safe alternative for the treatment of symptomatic BPH.

Reduced bleeding with DRY CUT® transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) compared to standard TURP.

Objective: To compare bleeding and transfusion rate between patients who undergo standard transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and patients who undergo DRY CUT® TURP.Materials and methods: A retrospective comparison was made of 626 patients who underwent a standard monopolar TURP during 2004-2007 at the Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge with 620 patients who underwent monopolar DRY CUT® TURP during 2011-2014 at the same clinic. Transfusion rate, perioperative bleeding, prostate volume, resection weight, use of anticoagulation therapy, presence of prostate cancer, whether the operation was performed by a specialist doctor in urology or a resident and length of hospital stay were evaluated.Results: The median bleeding was 300 ml (IQR = 100-645 ml) in the group of patients who underwent standard TURP compared to 75 ml (IQR 30-268 ml) in the DRY CUT® TURP group. The bleeding quotient for standard TURP was 2.3-times the perioperative bleeding for DRY CUT® TURP. In a logistic regression model the patients who underwent standard TURP were more likely to undergo blood transfusion compared to DRY CUT® TURP (OR = 3.18, 95% CI = 1.72-5.88). The results were not affected by adjustment for patient age, presence of prostate cancer, anticoagulation therapy or operation performed by a specialist in urology. However, the resection weight did influence the bleeding quotient.Conclusions: The shift from standard TURP to DRY CUT® TURP has decreased the perioperative bleeding and need for blood transfusion at our hospital.

Device Malfunctions and Complications Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Introduction and Objectives: Multiple surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been developed to decrease complications and increase provider efficiency. We investigated contemporary BPH treatment device-related adverse events by searching a publicly available database. Materials and Methods: The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for contemporary BPH treatments. All devices were evaluated for malfunction, patient complications, and manufacturer review. The MAUDE adverse event classification system was used to standardize complications. Univariate analysis was performed to identify associations between BPH devices and adverse events. Results: A total of 2567 reports were identified: transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) 197 (7.67%), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) 39 (1.52%), GreenLight™ 2315 (90.2%), and UroLift® 16 (0.62%). The most common deviations for each modality included cutting loop detachment during TURP 116 (58.9%), morcellator dysfunction for HoLEP 23 (58.9%), tip fracture/detachment for GreenLight (68.8%), and failure to deploy during UroLift 10 (62.5%). Only 18 (0.7%) patients required medical/surgical management (MAUDE II-IV) due to a device complication. No significant relationship was seen between each modality and complications; however, morcellator use (27.8%) was observed in higher grade complications. Manufacturer review occurred in 61.7% of cases, with 41.3% of reviewed cases finding the operator the cause of the malfunction. Conclusion: Each BPH modality investigated had minimal patient harm with over 99% of patients experiencing no complication after device malfunction. Of note, great care should be taken with morcellator use during HoLEP as it had the greatest number of MAUDE II to IV complications among all devices. Manufacturer review revealed that over 40% of cases were due to misuse by the user. Therefore, urologists should select the modalities they are most familiar with to decrease patient harm and prevent device malfunctions.

Transurethral Enucleation With Bipolar Energy (TUEB):AINU Technique and Short-term Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To present our transurethral enucleation with bipolar energy (TUEB) technique, wherein the enucleated adenoma is resected while keeping it attached near the verumontanum avoiding the need of a morcellator, and to evaluate the safety and short-term outcomes of our technique of TUEB for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH). METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of prospectively maintained database of patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent TUEB from January 2016 to September 2017. Patients with a minimum follow-up period of 6 months were included in the study. All patients were assessed using the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), uroflometry (Q-max), and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) of the prostate. TUEB was indicated for patients with total prostate volumes >60 g on TRUS. Postoperative outcome measures, including urinary incontinence, Q-max, and IPSS, were recorded at each follow-up visit. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients underwent TUEB. The mean patient age was 64 ± 7 years, and the median operative time was 54 minutes (interquartile range [IQR]: 44-66). The median resected prostate weight was 39 g (IQR: 28-54 g), corresponding to approximately 87% of the assessed transitional zone volume. The mean postoperative hemoglobin drop of 1.08 ± 0.28 g/dL was clinically insignificant. There was significant improvement in the IPSS and Q-max postoperatively, when compared to baseline parameters (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Our TUEB technique is safe and effective in treating symptomatic BPH with acceptable complications and favorable short-term outcomes. TUEB allows near-complete enucleation of a prostate adenoma, followed by resection, thus avoiding the need for a morcellator.

Comparison Between Thulium Laser VapoEnucleation and GreenLight Laser Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate in Real-Life Setting: Propensity Score Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare in daily practice efficacy and safety of standard 180-Watt GreenLight laser photoselective vaporization (PVP) and Thulium laser Vaporesection of the prostate (ThuVEP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All men were evaluated with prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen, International Prostate Symptom Score, and maximum urinary flow. Patient global impression of improvement was evaluated with patient global impression of improvement scale for 6 months. Antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy, operation time, 24-hour hemoglobin drop , length of catheterization, discharge day, early complications, and reoperation after 30 days were gathered. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores to adjust for different patients characteristics. The propensity scores were estimated by fitting a stepwise logistic regression model with intervention type as the dependent variable and all the covariates. RESULTS: Five hundred five men underwent the surgical procedures (291 PVP and 214 ThuVEP). Mean age was 69.6 years. Mean prostate volume was 54 mL. Median operation time was 55 minutes. Median catheterization time was 2 days in both series. After matching, the postoperative stay was similar in both groups (2 days). Hemoglobin drop for 24 hours was statistically significantly lower in PVP (-0.5 vs -0.8 g/dL, P .002). Most of the complications were mild-to-moderate and comparable among groups. Δ Maximum urinary flow was similar 6-month after surgery before and after matching, whereas PVP group had a better improvement 12-month after surgery. 96.4% of all patients had an improvement of their symptoms, with no difference between groups, before and after matching. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that PVP and ThuVEP are similar in term of complications and outcomes, with high patients' satisfaction.

[Shovel-shaped electrode transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and effectiveness of shovel-shaped electrode transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) with those of plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data about 78 BPH patients received in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital from June 2016 to January 2017, 39 treated by shovel-shaped electrode PKEP and the other 39 by PKRP. We observed the patients for 6 months postoperatively and compared the effects and safety of the two surgical strategies. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the PKEP and PKRP groups in the operation time (ï¼»69.3 ± 8.8ï¼½ vs ï¼»72.2 ± 7.9ï¼½ min, P = 0.126), but the former, as compared with the latter, showed a markedly less postoperative loss of hemoglobin (ï¼»3.9 ± 2.8ï¼½ vs ï¼»13.9 ± 5.2ï¼½ g/L, P <0.001) and shorter bladder irrigation time (ï¼»12.5 ± 1.2ï¼½ vs ï¼»43.4 ± 2.8ï¼½ h, P <0.001), catheterization time (ï¼»64.0 ± 4.5ï¼½ vs ï¼»84.8 ± 3.0ï¼½ h, P <0.001) and hospital stay (ï¼»3.1 ± 0.3ï¼½ vs ï¼»5.5 ± 0.4ï¼½ d, P <0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between the PKEP and PKRP groups in the postoperative maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) (ï¼»21.62 ± 1.07ï¼½ vs ï¼»21.03 ± 0.96ï¼½ ml/s, P = 0.12), International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS) (5.85 ± 0.90 vs 6.03 ± 0.81, P = 0.279), quality of life score (QoL) (2.0 ± 0.73 vs 2.28 ± 0.72, P = 0.09), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) (ï¼»19.59 ± 6.01ï¼½ vs ï¼»20.21 ± 5.16ï¼½ ml, P = 0.629), or the incidence rates of urinary incontinence (2.56% ï¼»1/39ï¼½ vs 7.69% ï¼»3/39ï¼½, P >0.05) and other postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Both PKEP and PKRP are effective methods for the treatment of BPH, but PKEP is worthier of clinical recommendation for a better safety profile, more thorough removal of the prostate tissue, less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and better improved quality of life of the patient.

Temporal Trend in Incidental Prostate Cancer Detection at Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in the rate of incidental prostate cancer (PCa) after benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery over the last decade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1177 patients surgically treated for BPH (open prostatectomy, transurethral resection or holmium laser enucleation [HoLEP] of the prostate) in 2007-2016 at a single European academic center. Local polynomial regression was used to explore changes in the rate of incidental PCa detected after BPH surgery and of preoperative biopsy performed over time. Logistic regression analyses tested the association of incidental PCa diagnosis with year of surgery and preoperative biopsy. RESULTS: Incidental PCa was found in 6.4% (74) of cases, 67 (91%) with Grade group 1 disease. We observed an increased incidence of PCa diagnosis after BPH surgery over time (odds ratio [OR]: 1.12; 95%confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.24, P = .02) along with a concomitant decrease in the rate of preoperative prostate biopsies (OR: 0.83; 95%CI: 0.79-0.88, P < .0001). Patients undergoing a preoperative biopsy showed a lower risk of being diagnosed with PCa after surgery (OR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.12, 0.72 P = .007). Patients treated with HoLEP had a higher chance of incidental PCa detection (OR: 2.28; 95%CI: 1.30-4.00; P = .004), although this may be related to the significantly higher number of HoLEP performed over the last years. CONCLUSION: The increased rate of low-risk PCa detected after BPH surgery in the last decade reflects the clinical practice changes in PCa screening and diagnosis leading to a reduced number of unnecessary biopsies and indolent cancer diagnosis.

Perioperative stroke following transurethral resection of prostate: high index of suspicion and stabilization of physiological parameters can save lives / Acidente vascular cerebral no perioperatório após ressecção transuretral de próstata: alto índice de suspeita e estabilização de parâmetros fisiológicos podem salvar vidas

Abstract We report a case of a 72 year old hypertensive male who developed severe hypertension followed by neurological deterioration in the immediate postoperative period after transurethral resection of prostate. While arterial blood gas and laboratory tests excluded transurethral resection of prostate syndrome or any other metabolic cause, reduction of blood pressure failed to ameliorate the symptoms. A cranial CT done 4 hours after the onset of neurological symptoms revealed bilateral gangliocapsular and right thalamic infarcts. Oral aspirin was advised to prevent early recurrent stroke. Supportive treatment and mechanical ventilation ensured physiological stability and the patient recovered completely over the next few days without any residual neurological deficit.

Resumo Relatamos o caso de um paciente hipertenso, 72 anos, que desenvolveu hipertensão grave seguida de deterioração neurológica no pós-operatório imediato após ressecção transuretral de próstata. Embora os testes laboratoriais e a gasometria tenham excluído a síndrome de ressecção transuretral de próstata ou qualquer outra causa metabólica, a diminuição da pressão sanguínea não conseguiu melhorar os sintomas. Uma tomografia computadorizada craniana, realizada 4 horas após o aparecimento de sintomas neurológicos, revelou infartos gangliocapsular bilateral e talâmico à direita. AAS oral foi aconselhado para prevenir um acidente vascular cerebral recorrente precoce. O tratamento de apoio e a ventilação mecânica garantiram a estabilidade fisiológica e o paciente obteve recuperação completa durante os próximos dias, sem qualquer déficit neurológico residual.

[En bloc holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HOLEP EN BLOC): our experience].

INTRODUCTION: Some authors consider HoLEP a new gold standard for the surgical management of prostatic hyperplasia. The increasing utilization of holmium enucleation has led to the development of various modifications of this treatment modality, including the so-called enucleation as a single piece (HoLEP en bloc), which reduces the operative time and, according to some authors, facilitates acquiring new surgical technique by surgical trainees. AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of the traditional HoLEP and HoLEP en bloc. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study comprised 227 BPH patients aged from 53 to 86 years old (mean - 61.38+/-5.09 years). HoLEP en bloc was performed in 114 patients, of whom 39 patients had prostate volume (Vpr) less than 80 cm3, and in 75 patients it was more than 80 cm3. The standard HoLEP was performed in 113 patients, of whom 41 patients had Vpr less than 80 cm3, and in 72 patients it was more than 80 cm3. RESULTS: Enucleation time: HoLEP - 48+/-12 min, HoLEP en-bloc - 35+/-10; morcellation time: HoLEP - 20+/-3 min, HoLEP en-bloc - 16+/-12; duration of urinary bladder drainage by a urethral catheter: HoLEP - 58+/-3 h, HoLEP en-bloc - 41+/-2; length of hospital stay: HoLEP - 5.93+/-0.39 days, HoLEP en-bloc - 4.45+/-0.35; bladder tamponade, urethrocystoscopy and coagulation of bleeding vessels: HoLEP-3, HoLEP en-bloc-1; infectious-inflammatory complications (prostatitis): HoLEP-3, HoLEP en-bloc-2; acute urinary retention, stress urinary incontinence: HoLEP-6, HoLEP en-bloc-2; stress urinary incontinence: HoLEP - 5, HoLEP en-bloc - 2. CONCLUSION: En bloc holmium enucleation of the prostate results in the reduction of enucleation and total operative time compared with traditional HoLEP due to the fast identification of the surgical capsule and the right layer. Using this technique can improve the effectiveness of learning holmium laser enucleation of the prostate by surgical trainees.

Low-Power Vs High-Power Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Critical Assessment through Randomized Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the non-inferiority of Low-power Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (LP-HoLEP) to high-power (HP-HoLEP) for enucleation efficiency pertaining to the advantages of lower cost and minimal postoperative dysuria, storage symptoms, and negative sexual impact. PATIENTS AND METHODS: HoLEP was performed using 100W Versapulse, Luminis Inc., with 2J/25Hz for LP-HoLEP (61 patients) and 2J/50Hz for HP-HoLEP (60 patients). Two surgeons with different experience performed equal number of both procedures. Non-inferiority of enucleation efficiency (enucleated weight/min) was evaluated. All perioperative parameters were recorded and compared. Dysuria was assessed at 2 weeks by dysuria visual analog scale, urinary (Q.max and IPSS) and sexual (sexual health inventory for men score) outcome measures were evaluated at 1, 4, and 12 months. RESULTS: Baseline and perioperative parameters were comparable between the two groups. Mean enucleation efficiency was 1.42±0.6 vs 1.47±0.6 gm/min, P = .6 following LP-HoLEP and HP-HoLEP, respectively. Patients reported postoperative dysuria similarly in both groups as per dysuria visual analog scale. There was significant comparable improvement in IPSS (international prostate symptom score) and Q.max in both groups at different follow-up points. At one year, median IPSS and Q.max were comparable in both groups (P = .4 and .7 following LP-HoLEP and HP-HoLEP, respectively). Median postoperative reduction in prostate specific antigen was 89% (42:99) following LP-HoLEP vs 81% (62:94) after HP-HoLEP, P = .92. Both groups showed comparable perioperative and late postoperative complications. There were no statistically significant changes in the last follow-up sexual health inventory for men score in comparison to baseline score. CONCLUSION: LP-HoLEP is non-inferior to HP-HoLEP in terms of all efficiency parameters regardless level of surgeon experience.

Long-Term Outcomes of Laser Prostatectomy for Storage Symptoms: Comparison of Serial 5-Year Followup Data between High Performance System Photoselective Vaporization and Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate.

PURPOSE: We compared long-term storage symptom outcomes between photoselective laser vaporization of the prostate with a 120 W high performance system and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. We also determined factors influencing postoperative improvement of storage symptoms in the long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Included in our study were 266 men, including 165 treated with prostate photoselective laser vaporization using a 120 W high performance system and 101 treated with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, on whom 60-month followup data were available. Outcomes were assessed serially 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months postoperatively using the International Prostate Symptom Score, uroflowmetry and the serum prostate specific antigen level. Postoperative improvement in storage symptoms was defined as a 50% or greater reduction in the subtotal storage symptom score at each followup visit after surgery compared to baseline. RESULTS: Improvements in frequency, urgency, nocturia, subtotal storage symptom scores and the quality of life index were maintained up to 60 months after photoselective laser vaporization or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. There was no difference in the degree of improvement in storage symptoms or the percent of patients with postoperative improvement in storage symptoms between the 2 groups throughout the long-term followup. However, the holmium laser group showed greater improvement in voiding symptoms and quality of life than the laser vaporization group. On logistic regression analysis a higher baseline subtotal storage symptom score and a higher BOOI (Bladder Outlet Obstruction Index) were the factors influencing the improvement in storage symptoms 5 years after prostate photoselective laser vaporization or holmium laser enucleation. CONCLUSIONS: Our serial followup data suggest that storage symptom improvement was maintained throughout the long-term postoperative period for prostate photoselective laser vaporization with a 120 W high performance system and holmium laser enucleation without any difference between the 2 surgeries. Also, more severe storage symptoms at baseline and a more severe BOOI predicted improved storage symptoms in the long term after each surgery.

Safety and efficacy of photoselective vaporization of the prostate using the 180-W GreenLight XPS laser system in patients taking oral anticoagulants.

Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 180-W GreenLight XPS laser system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients taking oral anticoagulants. Methods All consecutive patients admitted for lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia from November 2012 to October 2016 and who underwent photoselective vaporization of the prostate with the 180-W GreenLight XPS laser were included in the study. The perioperative outcomes examined were the operating time, laser time, energy usage, and duration of postoperative catheterization. Functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume), prostate volume, and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration were examined at baseline and 3 months. Perioperative complications, if any, were noted. Results All functional parameters (International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urinary flow rate, and post-void residual urine volume) significantly improved from baseline to 3 months. A small number of patients experienced at least one minor adverse event. There was no difference in the rate of adverse events between patients who were and were not taking anticoagulants. Conclusions Photoselective vaporization with a 180-W laser is an efficacious and safe treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, even in patients taking anticoagulant medications.

Age and prostate volume are risk factors for transient urinary incontinence after transurethral enucleation with bipolar for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive factors for transient urinary incontinence after transurethral enucleation with bipolar. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 584 patients who underwent transurethral enucleation with bipolar between December 2011 and September 2016 operated by a single surgeon. Urinary incontinence after transurethral enucleation with bipolar was defined as involuntary leakage of urine that required the use of pads. It was evaluated at 1 week, and 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after transurethral enucleation with bipolar. We defined transient urinary incontinence as urinary incontinence persisting up to 1 month after transurethral enucleation with bipolar. Based on independent risk factors identified by a multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis, a nomogram to predict transient urinary incontinence was developed. RESULTS: Of the 584 patients, 17.3%, 13.5%, 3.1%, 0.41%, and 0% patients had urinary incontinence at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after transurethral enucleation with bipolar, respectively. The mean (±standard error) age was 69.6 ± 0.26 years, estimated prostate volume was 54.7 ± 0.91 cm3 , operative time was 58.0 ± 1.1 min and the prostate specimen weight was 30.6 ± 0.69 g. On univariate analysis, age, prostate volume estimated by transrectal ultrasonography, prostate-specific antigen, prostate specimen weight, operative time, prostate specimen weight/prostate volume and prostate specimen weight/operative time were significant predictive factors for transient urinary incontinence after transurethral enucleation with bipolar. On multivariate analysis, age (hazard ratio 1.07, P-value = 0.0034) and prostate volume (hazard ratio 1.03, P-value < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for transient urinary incontinence after transurethral enucleation with bipolar. CONCLUSIONS: Age and prostate volume estimated by transrectal ultrasonography seem to represent significant independent risk factors for transient urinary incontinence after transurethral enucleation with bipolar. This should be well discussed with the patient before surgery.

A novel vaporization-enucleation technique for benign prostate hyperplasia using 120-W HPS GreenLight™ laser: Seoul technique II in comparison with vaporization and previously reported modified vaporization-resection technique.

PURPOSE: We developed a novel vaporization-enucleation technique (Seoul II), which consists of vaporization-enucleation of the prostate using 120-W HPS GreenLight laser, and enucleated prostate resection using bipolar devices for tissue removal. We compared the outcomes of the Seoul II with vaporization and a previously reported modified vaporization-resection technique (Seoul I). METHODS: Among patients with benign prostate hyperplasia who underwent transurethral surgery using GreenLight laser at our institute, 347 patients with prostate volume ≥ 40 ml were included. The impact of surgical techniques on efficacy and postoperative functional outcomes was compared. RESULTS: No difference was found in baseline characteristics, although the prostate volume was marginally greater in Seoul II (p = 0.051). Prostate volume reduction per operation time (p < 0.001) and lasing time (p = 0.016) were greater in Seoul II. At postoperative 12 months, the International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS) was lower (p = 0.011), and the decrement in I-PSS was greater in Seoul II (p = 0.001) than other techniques. In multivariate analysis, postoperative 12-month I-PSS for Seoul II was significantly superior to vaporization (p < 0.001), although it was similar to Seoul I. The maintenance of immediate postoperative I-PSS decrement, until postoperative 12 months was superior in Seoul II compared with vaporization (p = 0.014) and Seoul I (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Seoul II showed improved efficacy and voiding functional maintenance over postoperative 12 months in patients with prostate volume ≥ 40 ml compared with vaporization and Seoul I. This technique could be easily accepted by clinicians who are familiar with GreenLight lasers and add flexibility to surgery without additional equipment.

Efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in men with bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and non-neurogenic bladder dysfunction.

We aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of men who had urodynamic evidence of detrusor underactivity (DU) or detrusor overactivity (DO) of a non-neurogenic etiology as well as bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) and who underwent Holmium Laser Enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP). A database of 322 patients who underwent HoLEP between 2010 and 2014 was analyzed. Patients were classified into three groups according to the results of a preoperative urodynamic study. Preoperative parameters such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QoL) index, IPSS grade, uroflowmetry were compared with postoperative parameters measured at 6 months. There were 138 patients with BOO-only and 89 patients with BOO and detrusor dysfunction including 56 with DO and 33 with DU. The degree of improvement in IPSS-total (BOO: 10.7, DO: 8.3, DU: 7.0; p = 0.023) was greater in the BOO-only group than in the DU group. There were more patients whose IPSS grade improved in the BOO-only group (71%) than in the detrusor dysfunction group (DO: 53.6% and DU: 45.5%). Postoperative IPSS-voiding (4.5 vs 7.0), and Qmax (18 vs 13.7) in the BOO-only group were significantly better than those in the DU group. Additionally, postoperative IPSS-storage (4.7 vs 6.7), and IPSS-total (9.1 vs 12.3) in the BOO-only group were significantly better than in the DO group (all p < 0.05). In conclusion, early surgical management for men with severe LUTS and associated BPH before secondary degeneration occurs may be beneficial for preserving detrusor function and yield better treatment outcomes.